Legal Opinion
United States v. Mead
United States Court of Military Appeals
Decided September 6, 1983No. 43041; NMCM No. 81-2495PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court
EVERETT, Chief Judge:
On February 10,1981, appellant was tried by a special court-martial, consisting of military judge alone, on nine specifications of a charge drawn under Article 92, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 892. The specifications alleged that on November 14, 1980, Mead had violated Article 1151, U.S. Navy Regulations, 1973, by wrongfully possessing, transferring, or selling marihuana. The judge found appellant guilty on five of these specifications and sentenced him to a bad-conduct discharge, confinement at hard labor and forfeiture of $334.00 pay…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Cafeteria & Restaurant Workers Union, Local 473 v. McElroySupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Ohio Bell Telephone Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
- Garner v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Paul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- United States v. WilliamsUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1984
- United States v. BoyettCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1995
- United States v. IrvinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
- United States v. SadlerUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1990
- United States v. HardyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.