Legal Opinion

United States v. Williams

United States Court of Military Appeals

Decided February 21, 1984No. 42,639; CM 440077PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court

EVERETT, Chief Judge:

On September 17, 1980, appellant was tried at Fort Hood, Texas, by a general court-martial composed of officers. The charge, preferred under Article 134 of the Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 934, contained a single specification, which alleged:

In that Private First Class Michael A. Williams [appellant], US Army, Headquarters and Headquarters Troop, 4th Squadron 9th Cavalry, 6th Cavalry Brigade (Air Combat), did, at Fort Hood, Texas, a military installation, on or about 0200 hours, 16 July 1980, wrongfully and unlawfully kidnap the person…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  2. United States v. DuBayUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1967
  3. James v. Dravo Contracting Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  4. Paul v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  5. Relford v. Commandant, US Disciplinary Barracks, Fort LeavenworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1971

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. United States v. CruzU.S. Army Court of Military Review · 1985
  2. United States v. SappCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2000
  3. United States v. BeatyCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2011
  4. United States v. IrvinUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1986
  5. United States v. FinchCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 2014

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API