Legal Opinion

People v. Pendleton

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided January 24, 1890PublishedCited by 9 opinions

Error to Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Respondent was convicted of carrying concealed weapons in violation of Act No. 129, Laws of 1887. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtLong, J.

Defendant was prosecuted and convicted before a justice of the peace under a complaint which charges—

“That heretofore, to wit, on .the 22d day of June, 1889, at the township of Ashland, in said county, Daniel E. Pendleton, late of said county, not being an officer of the peace or a night-watch, legitimately employed as such, did carry concealed about his person a fire-arm called a c revolver/which then and there was a dangerous weapon, against the form of the statute,” etc.

The cause was tried before a jury, and, after conviction, defendant was adjudged to pay a fine of $50 within 24 hours,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Territory v. ScottSupreme Court Of The Territory Of Dakota · 1880
  3. People v. TelfordMichigan Supreme Court · 1885

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. People v. ShulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  2. People v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  3. People v. GrabiecMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  4. People v. KenyonMichigan Supreme Court · 1918
  5. State v. QuinnNew York Court of General Session of the Peace · 1899

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API