People v. Shuler
Michigan Supreme Court
Exceptions before judgment from Eaton; Smith, J. Oliver P. Shuler, Sr., was convicted of violating the local option law.
1Opinion of the CourtCarpenter, J.
Respondent, a druggist in the city of Charlotte, was convicted in the court below under an information charging him with keeping a place where intoxicating liquors were sold, in violation of the local option law in force in Eaton county; the same being Act No. 183 of the Public Acts of 1899. We are asked to set aside the conviction for several reasons.
1. It is contended that Act No. 183 is unconstitutional, for several reasons: '(a) That it is unconstitutional because it violates section 25 of article 4 of the Constitution of Michigan. This section reads:
“No law shall be revised, altered, or…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Magoun v. Illinois Trust & Savings BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1898
- Missouri v. LewisSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
- Yaner v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1876
- Feek v. Township Board of BloomingdaleMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- Moody v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1917
- People v. CzckayMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
- Price v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1968
- Surtman v. Secretary of StateMichigan Supreme Court · 1944
- Klein v. WagenheimMichigan Supreme Court · 1967
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.