Legal Opinion

People v. Kenyon

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided June 3, 1918No. Docket No. 127PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from Calhoun; North, J. Levi Kenyon was convicted of practicing medicine in violation of Act No. '368, Pub. Acts 1913.

1Opinion of the CourtKuhn, J.

The information in this case charges that the respondent,—

“heretofore, to wit: on the 1st day of July, A. D. 1915, and on divers other days between that day and the 8th day of December, 1916, at the city of Battle Creek in the county of Calhoun aforesaid, did then and there practice medicine and surgery and did advertise and hold himself out to the public as being able to heal, cure and alleviate human ailments and diseases, he the said Levi Kenyon not being then and there the lawful possessor of a certificate of registration or license issued under and pursuant to Act No. 237 of the Public…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. PhippinMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. ShulerMichigan Supreme Court · 1904
  3. People v. CurtisMichigan Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Kingston v. Fort Wayne & Elmwood Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Myers v. CarrMichigan Supreme Court · 1863

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. People v. LuceMichigan Supreme Court · 1920
  2. People v. BakerMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  3. People v. RoseMichigan Supreme Court · 1922
  4. People v. BanksMichigan Supreme Court · 1926
  5. People v. LewisMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API