Legal Opinion

Atlantic Linen Importing Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided December 28, 1964No. 68985; protest 61/5308 (New York)PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Government’s motion to dismiss for insufficient protest denied by Lawrence, J., and Ford, J.; Rao, J., dissenting. The following memorandum accompanied the order:

Ford, Judge:

This matter is before us on a motion to dismiss the above protest on the grounds of insufficiency. The protest in question reads, as follows:

August 12, 1960

Collector of Customs

Bowling Green Station

New York 4, N.Y.

ATT: LIQUIDATION DIVISION

CE 980296 dtd. 5/4/59

Liquidated Aug. 5, 1960

Iner. duty $524.90 — NOT PAID.

We have been advised by our Customs broker that the above cited entry covering an importation for our account has…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
  2. Schell's Executors v. FauchéSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Herrman v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
  4. National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  5. J. R. Press Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Torch Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  2. Pukel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Wieboldt International Div. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
  4. Import Motors of Chicago, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API