Atlantic Linen Importing Co. v. United States
United States Customs Court
1Opinion of the Court
Government’s motion to dismiss for insufficient protest denied by Lawrence, J., and Ford, J.; Rao, J., dissenting. The following memorandum accompanied the order:
Ford, Judge:
This matter is before us on a motion to dismiss the above protest on the grounds of insufficiency. The protest in question reads, as follows:
August 12, 1960
Collector of Customs
Bowling Green Station
New York 4, N.Y.
ATT: LIQUIDATION DIVISION
CE 980296 dtd. 5/4/59
Liquidated Aug. 5, 1960
Iner. duty $524.90 — NOT PAID.
We have been advised by our Customs broker that the above cited entry covering an importation for our account has…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Arthur v. MorganSupreme Court of the United States · 1884
- Schell's Executors v. FauchéSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Herrman v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- National Carloading Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
- J. R. Press Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Torch Mfg. Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Pukel v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
- Wieboldt International Div. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966
- Import Motors of Chicago, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1966