Legal Opinion

Jonsson v. Oxborrow

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 2005No. 30473PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

EISMANN, Justice.

This is an appeal from the denial of a motion to set aside a default judgment on the ground of excusable neglect. We hold that the district court abused its discretion in refusing to set the default judgment aside and therefore reverse.

I. PACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

On August 4, 2002, the plaintiff Keith Jonsson paid the defendant Bret Oxborrow the sum of $100,000. The parties dispute the purpose of the payment.

Jonsson contends that it was paid pursuant to a written agreement signed the same day granting Jonsson an option to purchase real property. The written agreement dated…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Johnson v. NolandIdaho Supreme Court · 1957
  2. Reeves v. WisenorIdaho Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Garren v. SaccomannoIdaho Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Miller v. BrinkmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Consolidated Wagon & Machine Co. v. HousmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Meyers v. HansenIdaho Supreme Court · 2009
  2. PHH Mortgage v. NickersonIdaho Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Cuevas v. BarrazaIdaho Court of Appeals · 2008
  4. AgStar Financial Services, ACA v. Gordon Paving Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2017
  5. AgStar Financial Services, ACA v. Gordon Paving Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 2017

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API