Legal Opinion
Meyers v. Hansen
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 27, 2009No. 35534PublishedCited by 41 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
W. JONES, Justice.
I. Nature of the Case
George Hansen appeals from the denial of his Motion for Relief from Default Judgment. Ann T. Meyers, the respondent, obtained a default in an action against Hansen for securities fraud in 1993. Meyers filed for default judgment several years later in 2001. Hansen asserts that he did not learn of the Default Judgment entered against him until long after the district court entered an Order of Renewed Default Judgment in 2006. He contends that the default judgment should be vacated because it was entered in violation of his procedural due process rights and…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- United States v. Swift & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
- Kaiser Aluminum & Chemical Corp. v. BonjornoSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Pennsylvania v. Wheeling & Belmont Bridge Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1856
- Twelve John Does v. District of Columbia Appeal of Edwin A. Meese, Iii, Attorney General of the United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
- Gerda Dorothea Deweerth v. Edith Marks Baldinger, Defendant-Third-Party-Plaintiff-Appellant, Wildenstein & Co., Inc., Third-Party-Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by41 opinions
- State v. Victor Garcia-RodriguezIdaho Supreme Court · 2017
- AED, Inc. v. KDC Investments, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2013
- Ciccarello v. DaviesIdaho Supreme Court · 2019
- Wattenbarger v. A.G. Edwards & Sons, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Printcraft Press, Inc. v. Sunnyside Park Utilities, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2012
36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.