Legal Opinion

Miller v. Brinkman

Idaho Supreme Court

Decided October 7, 1929No. 5272PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWm. E. Lee, J.

— -For the failure of respondent Brinkman to appear or answer a complaint served on him within the time specified in the summons, a default judgment was entered against him. On Brinkman’s motion, the court set aside the default and vacated the judgment. The action was to recover for personal and property injuries and was against the respondent and the General Casualty Company of America. A few days after the entry of the default against Brinkman, the action was dismissed as to the Casualty Company, which had appeared.

It appears that attorney Albaugh appeared for the other defendant and wrote…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Culver v. Mountain Home Electric Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1910
  2. Brainard v. Coeur D'Alene Antimony Mining Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Consolidated Wagon & Machine Co. v. HousmanIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Weaver v. RambowIdaho Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Day v. BurnettIdaho Supreme Court · 1924

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Orange Transp. Co. v. TaylorIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Andrus v. IrickIdaho Supreme Court · 1964
  3. State Ex Rel. Sweeley v. BraunIdaho Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Thomas v. StevensIdaho Supreme Court · 1956
  5. Hollingsworth v. KoelschIdaho Supreme Court · 1955

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API