Legal Opinion

Futrell v. . Deanes

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided February 5, 1895Published

1Opinion of the Court

It appears from the record that the only question was, which party should pay the costs. Such questions are not considered in this Court. S.v. R. R., 74 N.C. 287; Hasty v. Funderburk, 89 N.C. 93.

Appeal dismissed.

Cited: Elliott v. Tyson, post, 184; Monroe v. Angel, post, 847; Elliottv. Tyson, 117 N.C. 115; Herring v. Pugh, 125 N.C. 438; Van Dyke v. Ins.Co., 174 N.C. 81.

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Elliott v. . TysonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  2. Hasty v. . FunderburkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. State v. . R. R.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1876
  4. VanDyke v. Ætna Life InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917