Legal Opinion

Elliott v. . Tyson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 5, 1895PublishedCited by 16 opinions

PbtitioN to rehear the case decided at February Term, 1895, and reported in 116 N. C. Reports, page 184. The facts appear in the opinion'of Associate Justice OlaRK.

1Opinion of the Court

Clark, J.:

As a general rule tbis Court will not bear an appeal when the only matter to be decided is the disposition of the costs. Russell v. Campbell, 112 N. C., 404, and cases there cited; Futrell v. Deans, 116 N. C., 38. This is especially so when the subject matter in dispute has been settled or destroyed and the only matter left to be passed upon is the adjudication of the costs by the court below. Clark's Code (2nd Ed.) p. 560. There are exceptions, among them the liability of a prosecutor for costs in a criminal action, State v. Byrd, 93 N. C., 624, and where the very question at issue…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Robeson v. . HodgesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. State v. . ByrdSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
  3. Capps v. . CappsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  4. Cheatham v. . CrewsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1879
  5. Singer Manufacturing Co. v. . BarrettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Springs v. ScottSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1903
  2. Hall v. . ArtisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1923
  3. Page v. . McDonaldSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912
  4. Settle v. Settle.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. McDaniel v. . LeggettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API