Legal Opinion

Hasty v. . Funderburk

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided October 5, 1883PublishedCited by 11 opinions

MOTION by defendant to dismiss the appeal, heard at October Term, ,1883, óf The Supreme Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMerrimon, J.

It is suggested, and made to appear to the satisfaction of the court, that the matter involved in this action has been settled by the parties thereto, and that it is unnecessary to decide the question of law presented by the exceptions speci fied in the record. It further appears that the defendant, the appellee, has notified the appellant that he would move at the present term of the court to dismiss the appeal when the case should be called in its order foUargument. Accordingly the motion to dismiss the appeal has been entered, and the appellant fails to appear and prosecute his appeal or…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State on Rel. Martin v. . Sloan .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  2. State v. Richmond & Danville RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1876

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Bayha v. PhilipsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1888
  2. Stauffer v. Salimonie Mining & Gas Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1897
  3. In re KaepplerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Pearson v. QuinnSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1914
  5. State Ex Rel. Herring v. PughSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1899

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API