Legal Opinion

State v. . R. R.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 5, 1876PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

A motion was then made by the defendants to vacate the injunction. Upon the hearing, among other things, it was adjudged by the court:

"Should the plaintiff appeal, he shall first give bond in the sum of fifty thousand dollars to continue the injunction, and also in the sum of five hundred dollars for costs of appeal."

From so much of the judgment of the court, as required the plaintiff to give bond in the said sum for the continuance of the injunction, the plaintiff appealed.

The case was before the court upon an appeal by the defendants, at June Term, 1875, and is reported in 73 N.C. Rep. The…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State on Rel. Martin v. . Sloan .Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1873
  2. Hasty v. . FunderburkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1883
  3. Davis v. . Board of Comm'rs., Stokes Co. and PoindexterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1875
  4. Kidd v. . MorrisonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1866
  5. May v. . DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. May v. . DardenSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1880
  2. Futrell v. . DeanesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1895
  3. In Re BurnettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  4. In re Burnett ex rel. FinburgSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1945
  5. Swink v. . HornSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API