Legal Opinion
United States v. Texas Pipe Line Co.
District Court, E.D. Oklahoma
Decided February 17, 1978No. 77-83-CPublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
DAUGHERTY, District Judge.
This is an action by the Plaintiff to collect a penalty assessed against Defendant for discharging a harmful quantity of oil into an unnamed tributary of Caney Creek in Atoka County, Oklahoma, in violation of § 311(b)(3) of the Federal Water Pollution Control Act Amendments of 1972, 33 U.S.C. § 1321(b)(3). It is asserted that the Court has subject matter jurisdiction of this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1345 and 1355. 1
From the record before the Court in this case, it appears without dispute that a crude oil pipeline owned by Defendant was…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Citizens to Preserve Overton Park, Inc. v. VolpeSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- National Labor Relations Board v. Columbian Enameling & Stamping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. HVI Cat Canyon, Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
- United States v. Healy Tibbitts Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Sipes v. State Ex Rel. Department of Public SafetyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1997
- United States v. Chotin Transportation, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 1986
- Ghosein v. United States Department of AgricultureDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1985