Legal Opinion

Picard v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided November 29, 1966No. R.D. 11242; Entry Nos. 1874-H; 2941-HPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rao, Chief Judge:

The appeals for reappraisement listed above were consolidated for the purposes of trial. They cover certain so-called sisal pads, exported from Mexico on or about August 8 and *690September 4, 1959. Since sisal pads were not included in the final list of articles (TJD. 54521) from which the applicability of the Customs Simplification Act of 1956 is withheld, appraisal of the involved merchandise was made on the basis of export value, as that value is defined in section 402(b) of the Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the Customs Simplification Act of 1956. This provision reads as…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United States v. BrechnerUnited States Customs Court · 1957
  2. Valley Knitting Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960
  3. Kuttoff, Pickhardt & Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  4. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1965
  5. United States v. Bud Berman Sportswear, Inc.United States Customs Court · 1966

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Greb Industries, Ltd. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1970
  2. Sharwell Bros. Shoe Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1968
  3. Sharwell Bros. Shoe Co.. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
  4. United States v. Louis Goldey Co.United States Customs Court · 1970
  5. Spanexico, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API