Legal Opinion

Duck River Electric Membership Corp. v. City of Manchester

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 15, 1975PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HENRY, Justice.

These two civil actions, consolidated for the purposes of appeal, raise two questions, viz:

1. Does the City of Manchester have the right to acquire, by eminent domain, so much of the electric system of Duck River Electric Membership Corporation as is within the boundaries of the city?

2. Assuming the existence of the right, what is the proper measure of damages?

I

The first suit was instituted by the City of Manchester, seeking to acquire, by eminent domain, certain property owned by Duck River Electric Membership Corporation, located within the corporate limits of the city…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Southern Railway Co. v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Home Beneficial Ass'n v. WhiteTennessee Supreme Court · 1944
  3. Memphis State Line Railroad v. Forest Hill Cemetery Co.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1906
  4. Zirkle v. City of KingstonTennessee Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Brooksbank v. Roane CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1960

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Missouri Cities Water Co. v. HodgeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
  2. Betty v. Metropolitan Government of NashvilleCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1992
  3. City of Shakopee v. Minnesota Valley Electric CooperativeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  4. City of Maryville v. EdmondsonCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1996
  5. Tennessee Ex Rel. City of Cookville v. Upper Cumberland Electric Membership Corp.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2003

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API