Legal Opinion

Harman v. Belk

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided August 17, 2004No. COA02-1470PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GEER, Judge.

Plaintiff C.D. Harman appeals a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding that defendant William I. Belk did not slander plaintiff during the course of a deposition in another lawsuit. We hold that any error in the conduct of the trial was harmless because the trial court should have granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict following the close of plaintiffs evidence. The deposition was a judicial proceeding and Belle’s comments were not palpably irrelevant to that proceeding. The comments were, therefore, absolutely privileged.

Factual Background

Defendant Belk was engaged…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
  2. Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
  3. Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  4. Houpe v. City of StatesvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
  5. Scott v. Statesville Plywood & Veneer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. KRIMBILL v. TALARICOCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
  2. Jones v. CowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
  3. Watts-Robinson v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
  4. BRUNSON v. LIVINGSTONE COLLEGEDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
  5. Bouvier v. PorterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API