Harman v. Belk
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
GEER, Judge.
Plaintiff C.D. Harman appeals a judgment entered on a jury verdict finding that defendant William I. Belk did not slander plaintiff during the course of a deposition in another lawsuit. We hold that any error in the conduct of the trial was harmless because the trial court should have granted defendant’s motion for a directed verdict following the close of plaintiffs evidence. The deposition was a judicial proceeding and Belle’s comments were not palpably irrelevant to that proceeding. The comments were, therefore, absolutely privileged.
Factual Background
Defendant Belk was engaged…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Harris v. NCNB National Bank of North CarolinaCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1987
- Manganello v. Permastone, Inc.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1977
- Jarman v. OffuttSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Houpe v. City of StatesvilleCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1998
- Scott v. Statesville Plywood & Veneer Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- KRIMBILL v. TALARICOCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2017
- Jones v. CowardCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Watts-Robinson v. SheltonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2016
- BRUNSON v. LIVINGSTONE COLLEGEDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 2025
- Bouvier v. PorterCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2021
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.