Legal Opinion

United States v. Ethan Stangland

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit

Decided October 19, 1959No. 12611PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Circuit Judge.

This suit was brought by the United States Government to collect a civil penalty from defendant under the provisions of the Agricultural Adjustment Act of 1938, 52 Stat. 31, as amended, 7 U.S.C.A. § 1281 et seq.

In 1954, defendant planted and harvested sixteen acres of wheat in excess of his acreage allotment. Defendant neither stored this excess produce nor delivered same to the Secretary of Agriculture. Claiming that defendant grew wheat in excess of farm marketing quotas, this suit was commenced in May, 1955. The Government demanded a money judgment for $394.24. A…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. Ethan Stangland, United States of America v. Max MunkCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1957
  2. Steccone v. Morse-Starrett Products Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  3. Glinski v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1937
  4. Sabadash v. SchavoCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1942

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. James Weir v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1962
  2. Prosser v. ProsserDistrict Court, Virgin Islands · 1996
  3. United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Hi-Way Electric Co. v. The Home Indemnity Company, and Pathman Construction Co., DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
  4. United States v. Andrew ParkerCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  5. McDonnell v. BirrellCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API