Legal Opinion
United States v. Andrew Parker
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided June 18, 2019No. 18-50058PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, Circuit Judge:
*376 Andrew Parker was convicted of an assortment of fraud crimes more than a decade ago. Since then, he has revisited our court at least ten times through a combination of a direct appeal, appeals from 28 U.S.C. § 2255 denials, requests for authorization to file successive § 2255 motions, and a petition for writ of mandamus. Though the procedural vehicles have changed, his arguments have not, and we have repeatedly denied his requests for certificates of appealability (COA) and authorization to file successive § 2255 motions.
Parker once again tried his luck with these…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Slack v. McDanielSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Miller-El v. CockrellSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
- Gonzalez v. CrosbySupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Kontrick v. RyanSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Caribbean Mgmt. Group, Inc. v. Erikon, LLCCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Ellen SwensonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- Crystallex International Corp v. Bolivarian Republic of VenezueCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2022
- Hewlett-Packard Company v. Toshiba CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Hunter DentCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.