United States of America for the Use and Benefit of Hi-Way Electric Co. v. The Home Indemnity Company, and Pathman Construction Co., Defendants
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
WILLIAM J. CAMPBELL, Senior District Judge.
Defendants-Appellants The Home Indemnity Company (Home) and Pathman Construction Co. (Pathman) seek reversal of an order of the district court denying their motion to stay enforcement of a registered judgment and to quash a garnishment summons.
The facts are not in dispute. PlaintiffAppellee Hi-Way Electric Co. (Hi-Way) obtained a judgment on July 21, 1975 against Home and Pathman in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan. The amount of the judgment was $48,653.04 plus interest from March 2, 1970. On September 9,1975,…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Cobbledick v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. River Rouge Improvement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- John Thomas Stanford v. Everett Utley, D/B/A Utley Trucking Company and E. C. HoodCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1965
- Hadden v. Rumsey Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Covington Industries, Inc. v. Resintex A. G. And Horst SusskindCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- Illinois v. SarbaughCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Indian Head National Bank of Nashua v. Richard Brunelle, U.S. Marshal for the District of New Hampshire, and Conproco Corporation, Ipa Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1982
- State of Illinois v. SarbaughCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1977
- Russell Fuhrman, D/B/A Russell Fuhrman and Company v. John LivaditisCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.