Legal Opinion
Qingdao Sea-Line Trading Co. v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided September 10, 2014No. 2013-1581PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REYNA, Circuit Judge.
Qingdao Sea-line Trading Company (“Sea-line”) appeals a decision of the Court of International Trade affirming the Department of Commerce’s final remand results in a new shipper review and assignment of an antidumping duty on Sea-line’s imports of fresh whole garlic bulbs from the People’s Republic of China. For the reasons set forth below, we affirm.
I
A. New Shipper Review
Sea-line challenges the Department of Commerce’s (“Commerce”) calculation of its antidumping duty, which it contends is not supported by substantial evidence. Commerce calculated the antidumping duty as…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Consolidated Edison Co. v. National Labor Relations BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Consolo v. Federal Maritime CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Qvd Food Co., Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- Dorbest Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Mittal Steel Point Lisas Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Nan Ya Plastics Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Downhole Pipe & Equipment, L.P. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2015
- Albemarle Corp. & Subsidiaries v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Jiaxing Brother Fastener Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2016
- Solarworld Americas, Inc. v. United States, Yingli Green Energy Holding Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.