Sokol v. Labor & Industrial Relations Commission of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
LAURA DENVER STITH, Judge.
Appellant Steve Sokol appeals the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission that he was not entitled to unemployment benefits because he left work voluntarily without good cause attributable to his employer. Because we find that Mr. Sokol did not leave his employment voluntarily, and further that, had he done so, it would have been for good cause, we reverse.
I. Factual Background of Termination of Claimant
Mr. Sokol was employed by respondent TAI Services, Inc. (TAI), a Georgia corporation. TAI’s business principally involves eddy current testing of…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Haynes v. Unemployment Compensation CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1944
- Belle State Bank v. Industrial Commission, Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1977
- Citizens Bank of Shelbyville v. Industrial CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
- National Labor Relations Board v. Ridgeway Trucking CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1980
- Heavy Duty Trux Ltd. v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1994
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by48 opinions
- Ayers v. Sylvia Thompson Residence CenterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2007
- Moore v. Swisher Mower & MacHine Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2001
- Quik 'N Tasty Foods, Inc. v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000
- Kimble v. Division of Employment SecurityMissouri Court of Appeals · 2013
- Miller v. Kansas City Station Corp.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1999
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.