Legal Opinion
Continental Bank v. Phoenix Insurance
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 14, 1972No. Civ. 38925PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
DUNN, J.
Plaintiff bank sued for money allegedly owing from defendant, based upon defendant’s issuance of a surety bond to plaintiff. From a judgment for defendant after a non jury trial, plaintiff appeals. Appellant contends the court’s findings VHI and IX are unsupported by evidence and, additionally, that such findings are “erroneous as a matter of law.”
We must view the evidence in a manner tending to sustain the judgment, resolving all conflicts in its favor and drawing from the evidence all favorable inferences reasonably deducible. (Estate of Bristol (1943) 23 Cal.2d 221, 223-224…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Estate of Bristol v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Hicks v. ReisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1943
- Sumitomo Bank of Cal. v. IwasakiCalifornia Supreme Court · 1968
- Jones v. Fireman's Fund InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
3Cited by9 opinions
- Mitsui Manufacturers Bank v. Federal Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1986
- Beach Community Bank v. St. Paul Mercury InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2011
- Cohan v. AlvordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
- Exeter Banking Co. v. New Hampshire InsuranceSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1981
- Halford v. AlexisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.