Legal Opinion

Halford v. Alexis

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1981No. Civ. 58620PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

KLEIN, P. J.

This case presents the issue of whether the statutory process by which California converted from a calendar-year vehicle license renewal system to a staggered, year-round system, effective as of the 1976 registration year, violates the equal protection clauses of the United States and California Constitutions.

For the reasons discussed, we conclude that the implementation of the year-round registration plan comports with constitutional guarantees.

Background

Appellant Hugh A. Halford (Halford) was the owner of a motor vehicle registered in California during the 1976-1977…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Reed v. ReedSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Skinner v. Oklahoma Ex Rel. WilliamsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Regents of the University of California v. BakkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Vance v. BradleySupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. People v. SmithCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  2. Dawson v. Westerly Investigations, Inc.Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1988
  3. Dawson v. Westerly Investigations, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1988
  4. Cohan v. AlvordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Johnston v. AlexisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API