Legal Opinion
United States v. Francisco Alonso Portillo-Cano
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided December 6, 1999No. 98-10189PublishedCited by 57 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RESTANI, Judge:
Francisco Aonso Portillo-Cano (“Portil-lo-Cano” or “defendant”) appeals his guilty plea entered before the district court on the ground that his plea did not conform to the requirements of Rule 11(c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The government asserts that defendant is barred from appealing his sentence because his plea agreement included a waiver of his right to appeal. We hold that we may hear defendant’s appeal in order to determine whether his guilty plea failed to comply with the requirements of Rule 11 because the trial judge did not explain the nature of…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McCarthy v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. Jose Navarro-BotelloCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Dennis L. WengerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
- United States v. Lawrence BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Jorge VENCES, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by57 opinions
- United States v. Pascual Dionicio JeronimoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Jose Covian-SandovalCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- United States v. BiblerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- United States v. Jose Luis NunezCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. SpeelmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2005
52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.