Legal Opinion

CAROLINA CENTRAL GAS COMPANY v. Hyder

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 23, 1955No. 163PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDenny, J.

The petitioner assigns as error thirty exceptions to rulings of the court in the course of the trial below. However, we deem it necessary to discuss only those which present these questions. (1) In view of the rights acquired by the petitioner, was it error to refuse to instruct the jury that, “"When land is appropriated under the power of eminent domain for a right of way or easement, the eondemner acquires an easement only in the land so taken, and the fee of the property remains in the landowner, who may subject the land to any use which is not inconsistent with its use for the purpose for…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. North Carolina State Highway & Public Works Commission v. BlackSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
  2. Carolina Power & Light Co. v. BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  3. Proctor v. Highway CommissionSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1949
  4. Chesson v. . JordanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Railroad v. Land Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Coastal Plains Utilities, Inc. v. New Hanover CountyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2004
  2. Carolina Power and Light Company v. ClarkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1956
  3. Henderson v. Iowa State Highway CommissionSupreme Court of Iowa · 1967
  4. City of Statesville v. BowlesCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1969
  5. Fanning v. Mapco, Inc.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1970

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API