Legal Opinion

Shepherdson v. Nigro

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided May 13, 1998No. Civil Action No. 97-5504PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM and ORDER

WALDMAN, District Judge.

Presently before the court is defendant’s Motion for Imposition of Rule 11 Sanctions. Defendant seeks monetary sanctions against *151Rosemarie Rhodes, plaintiffs counsel in this action. Defendant asks specifically that counsel be fined and ordered to pay attorney fees and costs to defendant. Defendant asserts that such sanctions are appropriate “based on the legally frivolous claims presented in plaintiffs complaint.”

Plaintiff alleged that the failure of defendant, when serving as a Philadelphia Common Pleas Court judge, to recuse himself in her court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Tumey v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Aetna Life Insurance v. LavoieSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Commonwealth Coatings Corp. v. Continental Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Dale Schaper v. City of Huntsville, Gene Pipes and Hank EckhardtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  5. Deblasio v. Zoning Board Of Adjustment For The Township Of West AmwellCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1995

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In Re Cendant Corp. Derivative Action LitigationDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2000
  2. Greeley Publishing Co. v. HergertDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2006
  3. Robinson-Reeder v. KearnsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
  4. Chien v. Kollar-KotellyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API