Legal Opinion

Chien v. Kollar-Kotelly

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided May 6, 2020No. Civil Action No. 2019-3100Published

1Opinion of the Court

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ANDREW CHIEN, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-3100 (JEB) COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Pro se Plaintiff Andrew Chien has brought several securities-related lawsuits that were assigned to Judge Colleen Kollar-Kotelly of this federal district. Unhappy with her rulings adverse to him, he then filed this suit against her, which seeks various forms of relief, including her removal from his three cases. Given that Judge Kollar-Kotelly is judicially immune, her Motion to Dismiss will be granted. The judge’s Motion…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. Pierson v. RaySupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Forrester v. WhiteSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Bradley v. FisherSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  5. Antoine v. Byers & Anderson, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API