Legal Opinion
Robinson-Reeder v. Kearns
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided October 3, 2011No. Civil Action No. 2011-0432PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
JAMES E. BOASBERG, District Judge.
Pro se Plaintiff Jacqueline RobinsonReeder is an extremely dissatisfied litigant. In her current action — the latest of many — she names as Defendants a lawyer who represented her opponent in prior suits and various D.C. Superior Court, D.C. Court of Appeals, U.S. District Court, and U.S. Court of Appeals judges whose rulings she takes issue with. As all of her claims against the judges relate to their official judicial acts, they are immune from suit. Similarly, Plaintiff fails to assert any comprehensible facts that could constitute a…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Imbler v. PachtmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Stump v. SparkmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Egwuenu v. NapolitanoDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Hodge v. Ku Klux KlanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012