Ouilmette Construction & Engineering Co. v. United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the CourtBooth, Chief Justice
This case is similar to the case of Gillen Co. v. United States, 88 C. Cls. 347. The one issue involved is determinable as one of law from facts which do not admit of serious dispute. The defendant accepted plaintiff’s bid to furnish all the materials and labor necessary to construct Lock No. 4 in the Mississippi River at Alma, Wisconsin. The plaintiff is a Delaware corporation and possessed the equipment essential for the contract work.
*343Specification. 2 (c) contained the provisions set forth in Finding 4. From this specification the contractor learned that the defendant did not own certain…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McCloskey ex rel. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1928
- Phoenix Bridge Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1937
- Karno-Smith Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1936
- Plato v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938
- Edward E. Gillen Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1939
3Cited by1 opinion
- George A. Fuller Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1947