Legal Opinion

AGV Productions, Inc. v. Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided September 15, 2000No. 99 CIV. 9852(AGS)PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER

SCHWARTZ, District Judge.

In this action, plaintiff seeks a declaratory judgment that defendant Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer, Inc. is not the owner of certain sequel rights in the motion picture entitled “Terminator”. Currently before the Court are plaintiffs motion for summary judgment and defendants’ cross-motion for partial summary judgment and dismissal of the complaint. For the reasons stated below, plaintiffs motion is denied and defendants’ motion is granted.

I. Factual Background

A. The Parties and the Property

Plaintiff AGV Productions, Inc. (“plaintiff’) is a corporation…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  4. Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  5. Carol A. Gallo v. Prudential Residential Services, Limited Partnership, Doing Business as Prudential Relocation ManagementCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Twentieth Century Fox Film Corp. v. Marvel Enterprises, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  2. Obabueki v. International Business MacHines Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 2001
  3. Scholastic, Inc. v. StoufferDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002
  4. In re G-I Holdings, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2017
  5. In Re Adelphia Business Solutions, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2005

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API