Legal Opinion

Woodman v. Dana

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided July 1, 1860PublishedCited by 7 opinions

On Exceptions from Nisi Prius, Davis, J., presiding. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court, was drawn by

Rice, J.

This is an action to recover of the defendant, as administrator, the contents of several notes of hand, amounting in all to about four thousand dollars, on the ground that said notes were indorsed by the defendant’s intestate, Greely Sturdivant. The defence is, that said notes were not indorsed by said intestate nor by his authority.

The plaintiff claims to charge the defendant, first, on the ground that said notes were indorsed by his intestate, in his own handwriting; or, second, if not so indorsed, that said notes were indorsed in the name of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Homer v. WallisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1814
  2. State v. WatkinsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1831

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. University of Illinois v. SpaldingSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1901
  2. Hammond v. WolfSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  3. Johnson v. BeeWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1919
  4. State v. FarringtonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
  5. Moore v. PalmerWashington Supreme Court · 1896

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API