Legal Opinion

State v. Farrington

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided January 24, 1894PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Appeal from Jones District Court. — Hon. James D. Gteeen, Judge. The defendant was indicted, convicted, and. sentenced for the crime of forgery, and appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtKinne, J.

The charging part of the indictment in this case is:

“Philip Farrington, at and within said county, and before the finding of this indictment, to wit, on the twenty-fourth day of February, did have in his custody and possession a certain bill of exchange or draft, which said bill of exchange was and is as follows, that is to say:

‘$780.00. First National Bank, No. 64,813.

‘Tipton, Iowa, 1-10-1890.

‘Pay to the order - of Philip Pfarr ($780.00) seven hundred eighty dollars. To Hide and Leather National Bank, Chicago, Ill.

‘C. W. Hawdey, Cashier.’

*675And on the back of said bill of exchange was then and…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Moore v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Moon's Adm'r v. CrowderSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
  3. Vinton v. PeckMichigan Supreme Court · 1866
  4. Miles v. . LoomisNew York Court of Appeals · 1878
  5. Sankey v. CookSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. HurdSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  2. State v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1920
  3. State v. HillSupreme Court of Iowa · 1953
  4. State v. BoomerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
  5. State v. DebnerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1927

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API