Legal Opinion
Downie v. Brunton
California Court of Appeal
Decided December 18, 1956No. Civ. No. 5295PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGriffin, J.
Plaintiff and appellant was employed by Kaiser Steel Company (hereinafter referred to as Kaiser) in the early part of April, 1952, and was then a member of defendants and respondents United Steel Workers of America, Local 2869 and United Steel Workers of America. He was discharged by Kaiser on April 19, 1952. Defendant Brunton was an agent of the other defendants, had office space, and as such, maintained a grievance room at Kaiser’s plant. Plaintiff was on a so-called “probationary status” to him.
Plaintiff’s complaint is in three counts, (1) in tort alleging that defendants wrongfully…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Otten v. SpreckelsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1914
- Weck v. Los Angeles County Flood Control DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1947
- De La Falaise v. Gaumont-British Picture Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1940
- Perry v. FowlerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1951
- Tice v. Kaiser Co.California Court of Appeal · 1951
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Clark v. Quality Dairy CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 1966
- Lucas v. Hesperia Golf & Country ClubCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1967