Legal Opinion
Dickson v. Mattera
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 2, 2002No. 01-7120PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*22JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the brief and response to the court’s January 2002 order to show cause filed by appellant. It is
ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the district court’s orders filed June 7 and June 28, 2001, be affirmed.
Appellant cannot state a standard due process claim because the District of Columbia provides adequate post-deprivation remedies, see Hudson v. Palmer, 468 U.S. 517, 530-36, 104 S.Ct. 3194, 82 L.Ed.2d 393 (1984); Parratt v. Taylor, 451 U.S. 527, 537-44, 101 S.Ct. 1908, 68 L.Ed.2d…
3Cases cited6 opinions
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- United States v. Luther R. Wilson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Patricia Ann Wright, United States of America v. Shirley Ann Boyd, A/K/A Kim, A/K/A LisaCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1979
- Kuhn v. CisselDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1979
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by5 opinions
- Rason v. NicholsonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2008
- Scott v. ConleyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Mencias Avila v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2017
- Dukore v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- Black v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2015