Legal Opinion

People v. Hopper

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 1, 1937No. Crim. 1550PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

■ PULLEN, P. J.

Defendants are jointly accused of the crime of grand theft in the stealing and carrying away of one heifer. From the judgment of conviction and from the order denying a motion for a new trial this appeal is taken.

As grounds for appeal it is claimed the court erred in the setting of the cause for trial, in the instructions to the jury, insufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, and misconduct of the district attorney.

Appellants seem to place most emphasis for reversal upon their contention that the court erred in the setting of the case on November 24th for trial on…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. TapiaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  2. People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
  3. Matter of SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
  4. In Re Dal PorteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. People v. WolcottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State v. ScottOregon Supreme Court · 1964
  2. People v. RussellCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
  3. People v. EscobarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  4. People v. BoydenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1960
  5. People v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API