Legal Opinion

In Re Boykins

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Decided March 30, 2000No. 99-BG-823PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

The Board on Professional Responsibility (“Board”) has found that respondent, James R. Boykins, violated several Rules of Professional Conduct in the course of his representation of a co-conservator of an estate, and his subsequent representation of the heirs of that estate, beginning in March of 1992. 1 Respondent failed to provide a written fee agreement; failed to educate himself and comply with his duties as counsel to a conservator, including billing the estate for his services without court approval; failed to advise his client regarding the fee she was entitled to as conservator;…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re DelaneyDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. In Re EvansDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006
  2. In Re ChapmanDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. In re Stephen T.YelvertonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2014
  4. In Re WhiteDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2011
  5. In re NwadikeDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 2006

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API