Legal Opinion

Ladonia Cotton Oil Co. v. Shaw

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 29, 1901PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Fannin. Tried below before Hon'. Ben H. Denton.

1Opinion of the Court

TEMPLETON, Associate Justice.

The appellee, M. Y. Shaw, was an employe of the appellant, the Ladonia Cotton Oil Company, and lost an arm while engaged in feeding a crusher in the company’s mill. He brought suit on account of his injuries, and prosecuted same successfully in the District Court.

In his petition, Shaw attributed his injuries to defects in the crusher, and to the failure of the company to warn him of the consequential danger. Contributory negligence and assumed risk were the defenses -relied on by the company. Whether the evidence was sufficient to establish liability is the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. SomersTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. FrenchTexas Supreme Court · 1893
  3. Texas & Pacific Ry. Co. v. BradfordTexas Supreme Court · 1886
  4. Green v. CrossTexas Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Rogers v. Galveston City Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1890

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cisco Oil Mill v. Van GeemCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  2. Klutts v. Gibson Bros.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  3. Kirby Lumber Co. v. HardyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
  4. Hood v. Houston Packing Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1910
  5. Hutcherson v. Amarillo St. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API