Cisco Oil Mill v. Van Geem
Court of Appeals of Texas
Appeal from Eastland County Court; E. A. Hill, Judge. Action by Chas. M. Van Geem against the Cisco Oil Mill. From a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtDunklin, J.
This is the second appeal in this ease; the decision upon the former appeal being reported in 152 S. W. 1108. Chas. Van Geem, plaintiff in the case, sustained an injury to his hand as the result of that member coming in contact with the saws of a gin operated by the Cisco Oil Mill, and he instituted this suit against the company for damages resulting from that injury. Upon the former trial a judgment was rendered in favor of the defendant. Upon the last trial the plaintiff recovered and the defendant has appealed.
According to plaintiff’s testimony given upon the trial, at the time of his…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Ablowich v. Greenville Natl. Bank.Texas Supreme Court · 1902
- Bonnet v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1895
- Pecos & North Texas Railway Co. v. Canyon Coal Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1909
- Green v. CrossTexas Supreme Court · 1890
- Allen v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1896
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Johnson v. Murray Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Traders & General Ins. Co. v. PattonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
- Jaco v. W. A. Nash Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1925
- Harris v. SadlerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Thomas v. Missouri Pac. R. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1926
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.