Legal Opinion

Ex Parte Bedingfield

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided August 25, 2000No. 1981892PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Plaintiffs Mack Bedingfield, Jr., Mary Bedingfield, Classie Mae Peebles, Egbert Peebles, Lyla M. Peebles, Withers G. Peebles, Jr., Withers G. Peebles III, John Brent Peebles, Annie R. Yarbrough, and Milton E. Yarbrough, Jr. (Bedingfield group), petitioned this Court for a writ of certiorari for review of the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming an adverse summary judgment and applying a substantial-compliance analysis to the zoning-ordinance notice requirements of §§ 11-52-77 and -78, Ala. Code 1975. We granted the writ to determine whether the Court of Civil Appeals' decision…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Kennon & Associates, Inc. v. GentrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  2. Budco Theatres, Inc. v. Zoning Hearing BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  3. Builders Dev. Co. v. City of OpelikaSupreme Court of Alabama · 1978
  4. Bedingfield v. Mooresville Town CouncilCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1999

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Peebles v. Mooresville Town CouncilSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
  2. Town of Stevenson v. SelbyCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2001
  3. Buck v. CH Highland, LLC (In re Buck)Supreme Court of Alabama · 2017
  4. Speakman v. City of CullmanCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2002
  5. Bedingfield v. Mooresville Town CouncilCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API