Legal Opinion
Buck v. CH Highland, LLC (In re Buck)
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided October 27, 2017No. 1151011PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
SHAW, Justice.
Frank S. Buck and Martha Jane Buck, the plaintiffs in an action below challenging the validity of a rezoning ordinance, petitioned this Court for certiorari review of the decision of the Court of Civil Appeals affirming the trial court's judgment in favor of the defendants, CH Highland, LLC ("Highland"), and the City of Birmingham ("the City") (hereinafter referred to collectively as "the respondents"). Buck v. CH Highland, LLC, 256 So.3d 75 (Ala. Civ. App. 2016). We reverse and remand.
Facts and Procedural History
The Bucks own real property located in the City. Frank operates a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited21 opinions
- National Collegiate Athletic Ass'n v. JonesTexas Supreme Court · 1999
- VE CORP. v. Ernst & YoungTexas Supreme Court · 1993
- Ex Parte Toyota Motor Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
- Chapman v. GoodenSupreme Court of Alabama · 2007
- Alabama Alcoholic Beverage Control Board v. City of BirminghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1950
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Buck v. CH Highland, LLCCourt of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2017