Hoadley v. Hoadley
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs and matter remitted to Supreme Court for further proceedings in accordance with the following Memorandum: As limited by his brief (see, Ciesinski v Town of Aurora, 202 AD2d 984), plaintiff challenges on appeal that portion of a judgment that provided for equitable distribution of the parties’ property, ordered plaintiff to pay maintenance to defendant, and awarded defendant $3,000 in attorney’s fees. Plaintiff’s primary contention is that Supreme Court improperly categorized, valued, and distributed the marital…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Ciesinski v. Town of AuroraAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Price v. PriceNew York Court of Appeals · 1986
- Monks v. MonksAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
3Cited by4 opinions
- Allen v. AllenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Fridmann-Harkiewicz v. HarkiewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Fridmann-Harkiewicz v. HarkiewiczAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
- Kenney v. LuremanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004