Legal Opinion
Paris Utility District v. A.C. Lawrence Leather Co., Inc.
Court of Appeals for the First Circuit
Decided November 15, 1988No. 88-1287PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BOWNES, Circuit Judge.
This contract diversity action when tried in the district court involved a number of factual and legal issues. The district court wrote a comprehensive and trenchant opinion. Paris Utility District v. A.C. Lawrence Leather Co., 665 F.Supp. 944 (D.Me.1987). The appeal, however, presents only one issue: the effect to be given an indemnity agreement entered into between plaintiff-appellee Paris Utility District and defendant-appellant A.C. Lawrence Leather Co.
I. The basic facts, which are taken from the district court opinion, are not in dispute. Paris Utility District is a…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Emery Waterhouse Co. v. LeaSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1983
- Northeast Bank of Lewiston & Auburn v. MurphySupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1986
- Paris Utility District v. A.C. Lawrence Leather Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1987
- Whit Shaw Associates v. WardwellSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
3Cited by12 opinions
- Mercier v. Town of FairfieldSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1993
- Strong v. Option One Mortgage Corp.United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2004
- United States v. Conagra Grocery Products Co.District Court, D. Maine · 2014
- Clay v. Jie - DavisDistrict Court, D. Guam · 2016
- Connie Edmonson v. Lincoln National Life InsurancCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.