Legal Opinion

Walsh v. Walsh

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 31, 1940No. Civ. 12689PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMcCOMB, J.

From a judgment entered after trial before the court without a jury in an action to recover damages for an alleged breach of a property settlement agreement, plaintiff appeals.

Viewing the evidence most favorably to the defendant (respondent), the essential facts are:

Plaintiff and defendant were husband and wife. February 21, 1927, they entered into a property settlement agreement hereinafter referred to as the “first agreement”, reading in part thus:

‘.‘III. The husband shall, so long as the wife remains unmarried to any person other than the husband, pay to the wife, for her separate…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ferrea v. TubbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  2. Miller v. CoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
  3. Summers v. WoodsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1937
  4. Milton Realty Co. v. ButterfieldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1927
  5. Hancock v. HuntCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1917

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Katemis v. WesterlindCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
  2. Leiter v. HandelsmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1954
  3. Chambreau v. CoughlanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Hofland v. GustafsonAppellate Division of the Superior Court of California · 1955
  5. Alfinito v. SaterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API