Legal Opinion

Ranier v. Stuart and Freida, PC

Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided November 8, 1994No. 83766PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HUNTER, Judge:

This case comes on appeal under the new accelerated procedure of 12 O.S.Supp.1994, Ch. 15, App. 2, Rule 1.203 from summary judgment granted to Appellees on the ground that Appellant’s legal malpractice action was barred by the statute of limitations.

Appellant retained Appellees to represent him in a lawsuit which was ultimately dismissed as time-barred on August 15, 1990. On September 12, 1990, Appellee Hammond mailed a letter to Appellant along with the judge’s order, notifying him that the lawsuit had been dismissed and an appeal had been filed. In the letter, Hammond…

2Cases cited41 opinions

  1. Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  2. United States National Bank of Oregon v. DaviesOregon Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Flanders v. Crane Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
  4. Knight v. FurlowDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1989
  5. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of Florida · 1990

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. R.D.H. Communications, Ltd. v. WinstonDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. Wing v. LortonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2011
  3. Myers v. MaxeyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
  4. Smith v. LayonCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2007
  5. Bautista v. TorresSuperior Court of Guam · 2014

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API