Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co. v. Lane
Supreme Court of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
565 So.2d 1323 (1990)
PEAT, MARWICK, MITCHELL & CO., Petitioner,
v.
Frank A. LANE, et Ux., Respondents.
No. 74031.
Supreme Court of Florida.
July 26, 1990.
Parker D. Thomson and Karen Williams Kammer of Thomson, Muraro, Bohrer & Razook, P.A., Miami, for petitioner.
Shelley H. Leinicke of Wicker, Smith, Blomqvist, Tutan, O'Hara, McCoy, Graham & Lane, Fort Lauderdale, for respondents.
OVERTON, Justice.
This cause is before the Court on petition to review Lane v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell & Co., 540 So.2d 922 (Fla. 3d DCA 1989), in which the Third District Court of Appeal held that the limitations period…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Edwards v. FordSupreme Court of Florida · 1973
- Diaz v. PiquetteDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1986
- Birnholz v. BlakeDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Haghayegh v. ClarkDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Pierce v. AALL Ins. Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1988
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by98 opinions
- Carvell v. BottomsTennessee Supreme Court · 1995
- Hughes v. Mahaney & HigginsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
- Harvey v. Dixie Graphics, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1992
- Blumberg v. USAA Cas. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 2001
- Silvestrone v. EdellSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
93 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.