Myers v. Maxey
Court of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
CARL B. JONES, Presiding Judge:
Appellants, the widow, daughter and stepdaughter of deceased, sued attorneys and their law firm for legal malpractice, alleging the attorneys failed to have a will made by deceased (who had been placed under guardianship) subscribed and acknowledged before a district judge as required by 84 O.S.1991 § 41(B). The trial court granted a motion for a directed verdict by one of the attorneys, and entered judgment on a jury verdict in favor of the other attorney and the law firm. Appellants argue the trial court committed reversible error by denying…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Cosgrove v. GrimesTexas Supreme Court · 1989
- Hodges v. CarterSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
- Wartnick v. Moss & BarnettSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
- Messler v. Simmons Gun Specialties, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1984
- Great Plains Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. DabneySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1993
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Thomason v. PilgerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
- Mahorney v. WarenCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2002
- King v. NealCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 2001
- Whitehead v. Rainey, Ross, Rice & BinnsCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1999
- Opinion No. (1999), Oklahoma Attorney General Reports1999
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.