Legal Opinion
DeForest Radio Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. Triangle Radio Supply Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided July 9, 1926PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtCrane, J.
The plaintiff (hereinafter called “ DeForest ”), a Delaware corporation having its principal place of business in New Jersey, was engaged in the manufacture of radios, radio apparatus and accessories. The defendant (hereinafter called “ Triangle ”) was a New York corporation engaged in the wholesale business of selling radio products to dealers. On September 7, 1922, the parties entered into a written contract in which the plaintiff is referred to as “ DeForest ” and the defendant as the “ Distributor.” The main purpose of the contract was to furnish radios to the defendant upon the terms and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Strasbourger v. . LeerburgerNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
- Henderson Tire & Rubber Co. v. P. K. Wilson & Son, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1923
- Stokes v. . MacKayNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
- Sidney Blumenthal & Co. v. S. M. Gallert & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Goodyear Tire & Rubber Co. v. Vulcanized Products Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
3Cited by33 opinions
- Pesa v. Yoma Development Group, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 2012
- Net2Globe Intern., Inc. v. Time Warner Telecom of NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
- Lander v. Samuel Heller Leather Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1943
- Hermanowski v. Acton Corp.District Court, E.D. New York · 1983
- Ufitec, S. A. v. Trade Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1964
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.