Legal Opinion

McMillen v. Meyer

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 13, 1956No. 36,607, 36,610PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Matson, Justice.

In two actions for damages growing out of the same automobile collision, which actions were consolidated for trial and for appellate review, we have an appeal in one action by defendants from an order granting plaintiff-passenger’s motion for a new trial, and in the other action plaintiff-driver appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial.

Defendant Carlus G. Meyer, on April 6,1954, was driving his truck on Highway No, 61 in a southerly direction en route from St. Paul to Prairie du Chien, Wisconsin. He was accompanied by defendant James Anthony Fernette. They…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Cofran v. SwanmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  2. Lamp v. Pennsylvania R. R.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1931
  3. Helvetia Copper Co. v. Hart-Parr Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1917
  4. Kleidon v. GlascockSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1943
  5. Tiedje v. HaneySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1931

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Koenigs v. WernerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
  2. Melco Investment Co. v. GappSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1960
  3. Haugen v. International Transport, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1986
  4. State Ex Rel. Mondale v. NelsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1963
  5. Sieren v. American Family Financial Services of Wisconsin, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 1984

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API