Legal Opinion

People v. Rhoden

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 21, 1989No. Docket Nos. G006558, G008374PublishedCited by 18 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

SONENSHINE, J.

A jury convicted Lawtis Donald Rhoden of rape (Pen. Code, § 261, subd. (2)), 1 forceful sexual penetration (§ 289, subd. (a)), and sexual battery (§ 243.4); an allegation he had suffered a prior serious felony conviction within the meaning of sections 667 and 1192.7, subdivision (c) was found true. He appeals, citing numerous errors.

On June 2, 1984, 17-year-old Christine S. was walking home on Orange Avenue, returning from a babysitting job. Rhoden and a female passenger pulled up next to her in his car and began talking to her. He told Christine he was a photographer and…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. People v. PopeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  2. United States v. MauroSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. People v. LedesmaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. People v. JohnsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
  5. People v. MattsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Lawtis Donald Rhoden v. James Rowland, Director, California Department of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  2. People v. McMahanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  3. People v. DunlapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
  4. People v. MatthewsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1991
  5. People v. GarnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1990

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API